The Panama Papers

The Panama Papers is the biggest leak in the history of data journalism.

Massive data breach. In 2015, an anonymous source contacted German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, offering 11.5 million confidential documents from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca. This unprecedented leak, totaling 2.6 terabytes of data, exposed the inner workings of the global offshore financial system.

Global impact. The leaked documents revealed how wealthy individuals, political leaders, and criminals use shell companies, often in tax havens, to conceal their identities and assets. The Panama Papers implicated prominent figures worldwide, including:

• Heads of state and government officials from over 50 countries

• Business leaders and celebrities

• Organized crime groups and sanctions evaders

Journalistic collaboration. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) coordinated a global effort involving over 400 journalists from 80 countries to investigate and report on the Panama Papers. This collaborative approach allowed for comprehensive analysis and reporting across multiple jurisdictions.

Mossack Fonseca is a project of wealthy and powerful elites to help them take the benefits from society without paying for them.

Facilitating secrecy. Mossack Fonseca, founded by Jürgen Mossack and Ramón Fonseca, specialized in creating offshore companies and trusts for clients seeking financial privacy. The firm's services included:

• Incorporating companies in tax havens

• Providing nominee directors and shareholders

• Managing bank accounts and other assets

Questionable practices. The leaked documents revealed that Mossack Fonseca often failed to perform adequate due diligence on its clients, enabling:

• Money laundering

• Tax evasion

• Sanctions evasion

• Other illicit activities

Global reach. With offices in 35 countries and a client base spanning the globe, Mossack Fonseca played a central role in the offshore financial industry, creating over 214,000 shell companies for its clients.

At the commanding heights of the US economy, hiding a lot of one's wealth offshore is probably the norm, not the exception.

Power players implicated. The Panama Papers exposed numerous high-profile individuals using offshore structures, including:

• Vladimir Putin's associates

• Icelandic Prime Minister Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson

• Former UK Prime Minister David Cameron's father

• FIFA officials

Criminal enterprises. The leaked documents also revealed how organized crime groups and sanctions evaders used Mossack Fonseca's services to:

• Launder money from illegal activities

• Hide assets from law enforcement

• Circumvent international sanctions

Wealth concentration. The Panama Papers highlighted the extent to which the world's wealthiest individuals and corporations use offshore structures to:

• Minimize tax liabilities

• Shield assets from creditors and legal scrutiny

• Accumulate and preserve vast fortunes

Commercial lawyers sitting in European corporate head offices put a lot of thought into how they can use offshore companies to ensure their African subsidiaries pay as little tax as possible in those countries, and because of this the governments of those countries lack the money they need for schools, clothing and food.

Financial institutions implicated. The Panama Papers revealed that numerous banks and financial institutions actively facilitated offshore structures for their clients, including:

• Deutsche Bank

• HSBC

• UBS

• Credit Suisse

Widespread involvement. The leak exposed the extent to which major banks and law firms were complicit in:

• Creating and managing offshore companies

• Providing nominee directors and shareholders

• Facilitating tax evasion and other illicit activities

Systemic issues. The Panama Papers highlighted structural problems in the global financial system, including:

• Lack of transparency in corporate ownership

• Inadequate regulation of offshore financial centers

• Insufficient enforcement of anti-money laundering laws

This leak is not the first leak. Nevertheless, it does perhaps mark the start of something.

Unprecedented cooperation. The Panama Papers investigation demonstrated the power of collaborative journalism:

• Over 400 journalists from 80 countries worked together

• Shared resources and expertise across borders

• Coordinated publication for maximum impact

Technological innovation. The investigation leveraged cutting-edge data analysis tools and secure communication methods:

• Nuix software for processing and searching large datasets

• Encrypted communication platforms for secure collaboration

• Custom-built search and visualization tools

Public impact. The Panama Papers investigation resulted in:

• Widespread media coverage and public awareness

• Resignations of high-profile political figures

• Calls for reform of the global financial system

According to a study by the Tax Justice Network, Africa loses out on twice as much money through tax evasion as it receives in development aid.

Global inequality. The Panama Papers exposed how offshore havens contribute to:

• Wealth concentration among the global elite

• Loss of tax revenue for developing countries

• Undermining of social services and infrastructure

Societal impact. The use of offshore structures has far-reaching consequences:

• Reduced funding for education, healthcare, and social programs

• Increased burden on middle and lower-income taxpayers

• Erosion of public trust in institutions and governments

Facilitating crime. Offshore secrecy enables:

• Corruption and embezzlement of public funds

• Financing of terrorism and organized crime

• Human trafficking and other illicit activities

The start of the end of the tax havens.

Global response. The Panama Papers sparked renewed calls for financial transparency and reform:

• G20 countries proposed new measures to combat tax evasion

• European Union established a committee of inquiry

• United Nations called for increased international cooperation

Proposed solutions. Experts and policymakers advocated for:

• Public registries of beneficial ownership for all companies

• Automatic exchange of financial information between countries

• Stricter regulation and oversight of offshore financial centers

Ongoing challenges. Despite increased awareness and calls for reform, obstacles remain:

• Resistance from powerful interest groups

• Lack of political will in some jurisdictions

• Complexity of implementing global standards